Daniel Treisman, a UCLA political scientist… analyzed 218 episodes of democratization between 1800 and 2015 and found they were, with some exceptions (such as Danish King Frederick VII’s voluntary acceptance of a constitution in 1848), the result of authoritarian rulers’ mistakes in seeking to hold on to power.
According to the Bloomberg Opinion article, the five major mistakes are:
- Hubris: An authoritarian ruler underestimates the opposition’s strength and fails to compromise or suppress it before it’s too late…
- Needless risk: A ruler calls a vote which he “fails to manipulate sufficiently” (like Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet in 1988, when he lost a plebiscite on whether he should be allowed to stay in power) or starts a war he cannot win (like Argentina with the Falklands conflict of 1982)…
- Slippery slope: That’s Gorbachev’s case: a ruler starts reforms to prop up the regime but ends up undermining it…
- Trusting a traitor: This is not always a mistake made by the dictator itself, although it was in the case of Francisco Franco in Spain, who chose King Juan Carlos, the dismantler of fascism, as his successor…
- Counterproductive violence: Not suppressing the opposition when necessary can be a sign of hubris in a dictator, but overreacting is also a grave mistake…
I am curious to see what will happen with Vladimir Putin.
Archived article from Bloomberg Opinion: https://archive.ph/CyYaf. Original paper (34 pages, conclusions start on page 28; plus eight pages of references and 14 pages of Appendices including tables): https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23944/w23944.pdf:
Common mistakes include: calling elections or starting military conflicts, only to lose them; ignoring popular unrest and being overthrown; initiating limited reforms that get out of hand; and selecting a covert democrat as leader. These mistakes reflect well-known cognitive biases such as overconfidence and the illusion of control.