Aqua is a Danish eurodance band, best known for their 1997 single “Barbie Girl” (video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyhrYis509A). Some of the lyrics were suggestive, eg:
Make me walk, make me talk, do whatever you please
I can act like a star, I can beg on my knees
Come jump in, bimbo friend, let us do it again.
Mattel (Barbie’s owner) responded by suing in 1997 for trademark and copyright violations; Aqua and MCA denied the charges, and countersued for defamation after Mattel compared MCA to bank robbers.
Ultimately all the cases were dismissed in 2002; the song was ruled to be a legal parody. (The judgment does thoroughly cover the applicable law and precedents.) Apparently, though, the judge had some opinions about the case:
OPINION
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:
If this were a sci-fi melodrama, it might be called Speech-Zilla meets Trademark Kong.
…
With fame often comes unwanted attention. Aqua is a Danish band that has, as yet, only dreamed of attaining Barbie-like status. In 1997, Aqua produced the song Barbie Girl on the album Aquarium.
And in particular (bolding is mine):
An MCA spokeswoman noted that each album included a disclaimer saying that Barbie Girl was a “social commentary [that was] not created or approved by the makers of the doll,” a Mattel representative responded by saying, “That’s unacceptable…. It’s akin to a bank robber handing a note of apology to a teller during a heist. [It n]either diminishes the severity of the crime, nor does it make it legal.” He later characterized the song as a “theft” of “another company’s property.”
MCA filed a counterclaim for defamation based on the Mattel representative’s use of the words “bank robber,” “heist,” “crime” and “theft.” But all of these are variants of the invective most often hurled at accused infringers, namely “piracy.” No one hearing this accusation understands intellectual property owners to be saying that infringers are nautical cutthroats with eyepatches and peg legs who board galleons to plunder cargo. In context, all these terms are nonactionable “rhetorical hyperbole,” Gilbrook v. City of Westminster, 177 F.3d 839, 863 (9th Cir.1999). The parties are advised to chill.
Full judgment: 6,300 words: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4174039731032587001.
No news from Fix the News this week. But you still get an image from my favorites — an optical illusion. Look at it carefully…













